October 21, 2006

Book: What Terrorists Want

I’ve often argued that terrorism is a poor tactic because it doesn’t achieve its political ends. My son Kevin, one of the smartest people I know, argued that terrorists really weren’t trying to achieve political ends, but were trying for glory within their group. After we talked about it for a while, we decided that both statements were true, but only covered small pieces of the phenomenon. Now Louise Richardson has written a book that covers both and much more in What Terrorists Want. Her thesis is that terrorist groups have primary political aims, but individual terrorists are motivated by what she calls the three R’s, Revenge, Renown, and Reaction. To these individual, the primary aim is mainly used for self justification. I’m oversimplifying, of course, but it makes a lot of sense. She also offers solutions. I think they make sense, and perhaps we will someday try them. In the meantime, read this book. It’s worth it.

December 31, 2005

I knew things were getting better!

Finally some reports that indicate that I’m right. Check out The Peace Epidemic from a recent blog entry. It quotes from a piece in the Washington Post

By 2003, there were 40 percent fewer conflicts than in 1992. The deadliest conflicts — those with 1,000 or more battle-deaths — fell by some 80 percent. The number of genocides and other mass slaughters of civilians also dropped by 80 percent [between 1988 and 2001], while core human rights abuses have declined in five out of six regions of the developing world since the mid-1990s.

The news media wants us to be scared, and in fact, there is still some reason, but it seems to me that it’s a lot less than when I was growing up.